Use double quotes to find documents that include the exact phrase: "aerodynamic AND testing"
Brainstorming anti-corruption strategies

Community sport clubs in Canada can be vulnerable to financial fraud, where someone uses their position for personal gain by deliberately misusing an organisation’s resources or assets. According to our research, recently featured in a CBC Sports investigation, the impact of fraud can be deep and last for years, regardless of the amount of money stolen. Sport organizations in Canada are speaking up and telling their stories to help others learn and reduce their risk.

Incidents of fraud not only impact a sport organization’s finances, they can also affect the organization’s reputation, the experiences of sport participants and volunteers, opportunities for participation, and can generate community mistrust (Kihl, Misener, Cuskelly, & Wicker, 2020). The purpose of this blog is to provide research-based evidence about how and why sport clubs may be vulnerable to fraud and outline ways that sport organizations can be pro-active and reduce their risk. It draws upon our research team’s examination of media stories from Australia, Canada, Germany, and the United States from the years 2008-2018.

Indicators of Fraud

Our research, building on the fraud diamond outlined by Wolfe and Hermanson (2004), shows that there are four common indicators and themes in cases of fraud in community sport:

  1. Pressure – individuals who commit fraud often have incentives such as personal financial stressors, health problems including addiction, or lavish lifestyles.
  2. Rationalization – those who have committed fraud may deny responsibility, claim good intentions, or may self-justify their actions.
  3. Capability – individuals who possess the characteristics and skills to conduct fraudulent activity may be educated in finance or have a learned advantage.
  4. Opportunity – a lack of oversight regarding account access to bank accounts, financial reporting mechanisms, or vacancies of board positions can increase the risk of fraud.

These indicators help us understand how and why fraud can occur in sport organizations.

How is money being stolen?

According to our research, the main form of fraud that occurs in community sport organizations is embezzlement of four types:

  • Forging and writing blank cheques;
  • Siphoning funds (i.e., dishonestly taking money from an organization and using it for a purpose for which it was not intended);
  • Creating false accounts; and
  • Acquiring credit cards.

The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018) reported that skimming schemes (cash being taken prior to it being entered into an accounting system) were more common globally in the arts, entertainment, and recreation industries than in other sectors (e.g., banking, manufacturing, health care or social services). 

How can sport organizations prevent fraud?

Business creative coworkers team Meeting Discussing showing the results chart and graph Work.

Sport organizations should use a three-tiered approach to fraud prevention including training/education for organizational leaders on financial management best practices to increase awareness of risk; enhancing internal club management processes to limit opportunities for fraud; and detecting instances of fraud quickly after they occur. Is also important that sport organizations develop and implement specific measures. For example:

  1. Ensure timely and accurate financial reporting systems, including mandatory monthly financial reporting and full disclosure to the board.
  2. Implement procedures to safeguard assets, such as requiring expense and account creation authorisation by two or more individuals.
  3. Implement practices that are compliant with laws and regulations, including regular procedures to detect any possibility of fraudulent activities (i.e., external auditing, independent reconciliation of bank statements).
  4. Evaluate routines for handling organisational resources, such as eliminating e-transfers through personal bank accounts and ensuring the organization has established policies for collecting cash through player registrations, concessions, and fees, and mandatory reporting of fraud to authorities.

Moving towards a more robust anti-fraud strategy is an ongoing process that will require education, planning, and time as systems are changed to both prevent and detect potentially fraudulent activities. While these controls may be accompanied by increased costs for the organization in terms of time, energy, and some additional financial expense, the benefits should outweigh the costs and associated risks of not implementing financial controls. Ultimately, preventing fraud in sport will ensure the long-term sustainability of your organization and the important sport programs and services you deliver to your community.


Our research team is continuing to examine risk management practices and the ways fraud can be prevented in community clubs and associations. Community sport leaders interested in being involved in the next phase of the research are invited to click here for more information and to connect with the survey.


About the Author(s)

Katie Misener (@MisenerKatie) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies at the University of Waterloo. Her research focuses on the social impact and organizational capacity of community sport clubs. She is currently a volunteer with the youth in recreation committee of the Kitchener-Waterloo Community Foundation and is on the Board of Parks and Recreation Ontario. She is an active swimmer and skier and parent of two young athletes in hockey, dance, and swimming.

Lisa A. Kihl (@kihl_lisa) is an Associate Professor in the School of Kinesiology and Director, Global Institute for Responsible Sport Organizations at The University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on sport integrity and corruption, social responsibility, and athlete representation and governance. She serves on the USA Dance ethics committee. Lisa is a proud grandparent who loves watching her grandkids play basketball.

Pamela Wicker (@PamWicker79) is a Professor for Sport Management and Sport Sociology at Bielefeld University, Germany. Her research interests include non-profit sport organizations; societal relevance of sport; sport participation, wellbeing, and public health; and sport and climate sustainability. She volunteers at the Cologne Triathlon Team 01 in the roles of league officer for mass sports and cash auditor. Pamela is still a passionate athlete and competes in triathlon and tennis.

Graham Cuskelly (@GrahamCuskelly) is an Emeritus Professor and recently retired Head of Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Management at Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. Graham has researched sport volunteerism for 30 years and published numerous journal papers on community sport and volunteer management. He has volunteered for sport and community organisations for most of his adult life and participates regularly in golf, recreational boating, and beach walking.

References

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018). Report to the nations: 2018 global study on occupational fraud and abuse. Retrieved from https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/acfepublic/2018-report-to-the-nations.pdf

Kihl, L., Misener, K., Cuskelly, G., & Wicker, P. (2020). Tip of the iceberg: An international investigation of community sport. Sport Management Review. doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.06.001

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.


The information presented in SIRC blogs and SIRCuit articles is accurate and reliable as of the date of publication. Developments that occur after the date of publication may impact the current accuracy of the information presented in a previously published blog or article.